National Defence
Symbol of the Government of Canada

PART 10
CONCLUSIONS

CREATING OPERATIONALLY CAPABLE UNITS

In conclusion, what commanders should expect as the product of training are steady and capable multi-purpose units - units which are operational and have the potential to readily become more proficient with added equipment and prescriptive training. The following indicators are present in a good army unit after a period of training:

  • sound leadership;
  • good command and control;
  • cohesion;
  • standardized ways of doing things;
  • sound discipline and a disciplined way of doing things; and
  • the use of good battle procedure whether the task at hand is operational or administrative in nature.

    Units and formations in which these characteristics are evident can take on any task and quickly improve their readiness levels simply by increasing the time and resources available and the intensity of activity. They can prepare for any possibility by adjusting their focus. They can adapt quickly to new weapons and equipment, and the leaders can assume responsibilities two levels up.

    Moving out - into the future

    Units and formations lacking any these indicators are most assuredly not training properly. If they have not mastered these requirements, then they should go back to the drawing board and rebuild. They should train until they meet the specified standards and achieve these criteria.

    TRAINING - THE FUNDAMENTAL ACTIVITY

    Training is not just one more activity performed in the Army. When not engaged in operations it is the fundamental activity. It is the raison d'etre of an army in peacetime and the. most important activity in preparing for operations and war. Even if assigned frequent taskings in para-military roles and non-warfighting missions and even if the support in money, equipment and other resources is not at the optimum, officers, both commissioned and noncommissioned, must keep the profession of arms alive through training. That is the responsibility of the leadership of the army and training is the means by which the character, soul, spirit and muscle of the Army is molded, exercised and developed.

    Through effective training, brigade and unit commanders can learn from the past, build on lessons learned and prepare for the inevitable strains, challenges and opportunities of the future. Sound training will build strong teams which will succeed no matter the task. The most important team in the Canadian Army is the unit, the regiment, or the battalion. I encourage commanders and leaders in the Army to train their units hard and train smart.

    Lieutenant-General Sir Francis Tuker in his book, Approach to Battle, remarks:

    “Train hard: fight easy On the day of battle every officer and every man will bless the leader who has held fast to this motto and lived up to it. They will grumble in peace and rejoice in war, but in both peace and war they will have the self-respect that all men have who are true masters of their craft.” 24

    APPENDICES:

  • Appendix 1 Aide-Memoire - Training Visit By A Commander
  • Appendix 2 An After-Action Review Discussion Check List
  • Appendix 3 Model of Training Progression for a Unit
  • Appendix 4 Model of Training Progression - Specific-to-Mission Training
  • Appendix 5 “Know Thine Enemy,” by Peter Worthington.
  • Appendix 6 “Training Technology: The Challenges,” Major (Ret'd) Laurence O'Neill, CD

    BOOKS TO READ ON COLLECTIVE TRAINING

    There is not a lot written on the subject of collective training in the army. I would recommend the following books:

  • “APPROACH To BATTLE.” Lieutenant-General Sir Francis Tuker, British Army (Retired).
  • “COMMON SENSE TRAINING: A WORKING PHILOSOPHY FOR LEADERS.” Lieutenant-General Arthur S. Collins, Jr. U.S. Army (Retired).
  • “FAILURE IN HIGH COMMAND: THE CANADIAN ARMY AND THE NORMANDY CAMPAIGN.” Lieutenant-Colonel (Retired) John A. English, Canadian Army.
  • “HOPE Is NOT A METHOD.” General (Retired) Gordon R. Sullivan and Colonel (Retired) Michael V. Harper, U.S. Army (Retired).
  • “MEN AGAINST FIRE.” Brigadier-General S.L.A. Marshall, U.S. Army (Retired).
  • “THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE: THE ART AND PRACTICE OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION.” by Peter M. Senge.

    NOTES

    1. Stacey, Colonel C.P. The Official History Of The Canadian Army in the Second World War, Vol. 1, Six Years of War, Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1967. P253;

    2. Simonds, Lieutenant-General, G.G. Commentary and Observations, The Canadian Military: A Profile, ed., Hector Massey, Toronto: Copp Clark, 1972. P 267;

    3. Millet, A.R. and Murray, W. Military Effectiveness, Volume III, The Second World War, Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1988.P125;

    4. Sullivan, General G.R. and Harper, Colonel M.V. Hope Is Not A Method, New York: Random House, 1996. P 235;

    5. Canadian Army Manual of Administration and Discipline: 1957, Ottawa: Queen's Printer. P 1;

    6. Kitching, General George, Mud and Green Fields, Langley B.C: Battleline Books, 1985. P128;

    7. English, Lieutenant-Colonel John, Failure In High Command: The Canadian Army and The Normandy Campaign, Ottawa: The Golden Dog Press, 1995. P 315;

    8. Ibid. P317;

    9. Worthington, Lieutenant-General, F.F. Instructions to Officers, 1945, Toronto Sun, Peter Worthington, 7 July, 1997, P11;

    10. Blackburn, George, Where the Hell Are the Guns? Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Inc, 1997. P76;

    11. Tuker, Lieutenant-General Sir Francis, Approach To Battle, London: Cassell & Company Ltd, 1963;

    12. English. Op Cit. P317;

    13. Millet and Murray. Op Cit. P112;

    14. Sullivan and Harper. Op Cit. P 190;

    15. Granatstein, J.L. The Generals, Toronto: Stoddart Publishing Company Limited, 1993. P30;

    16. P. LaRose-Edwards, J. Dangerfield, J. Weekes, Non-Traditional Military training in Canadian Peacekeeping, The Commission of learning into the Development of Canadian Armed Forces to Somalia, Ottawa: Minister of Public Works of Government Service, 1997

    17. Whitaker, Brigadier-General D. And Shelagh, Dieppe: Tragedy To Triumph, Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1992. P72;

    18. Granatstein, Op Cit. P67;

    19. English. Op Cit. P 308;

    20. Montgomery, Field Marshal, A History Of Warfare, Great Britain: George Rainbird Ltd, 1968. P 23;

    21. Dunlop, Major W.A.S. The Fighting Soldier, London & Toronto: William Heinemann Ltd, 1940. P4;

    22. Sullivan and Harper. Op Cit. P 143;

    23. Ibid. Op Cit. P 193; and

    24. Tuker. Op Cit. P391.

  • APPENDIX 1: Aide Memoire Training Visit by a Commander